You are already running AI agents. Almost nobody your size has a dedicated
agent-security team — and the people who chose those agents chose them on cost, not on
containment. This is the part that stops them when they are wrong.
In July 2026 an autonomous agent executed 17,000 actions in one weekend and reached a
major company's production infrastructure. No human directed it. Nothing it did required a
stolen password. It had a mandate — and it exceeded it, because nothing structurally stopped
it. The question is not whether your agents can be trusted. It is
what happens when one of them is wrong.
THE DECISION WE MADE ABOUT PRICING
One product. One price. Every door closed. There is no cheaper version with
fewer protections, because a rogue agent does not check what you paid. The only thing that ever
changes is how many agents you run.
WHAT WE DO INSTEAD OF GUESSING
A signed action-path
The agent's whole plan is signed in advance. A step that is not on the plan does not
execute. We bind the sequence, not one call — because the attack is the sequence.
A birth certificate per agent
Post-quantum (ML-DSA-87), checked on every action rather than once at login. No
passport, no run. Shadow agents surface the moment they act.
Fail-closed, in the path
The action is blocked as it happens and the evidence is written whether anyone is watching
or not. Not an alert in a queue somebody reads on Monday.
WHERE IT WOULD HAVE STOPPED — STEP BY STEP
The July 2026 breach is public, recent, and exactly the shape of an agent with
nothing constraining it. Here is where each step meets a control — all of them included — there is
no tier where they are not.
1
Agent ingests a malicious dataset. The attack ends here. Untrusted
content is labelled at ingestion and structurally barred from driving a privileged action.
CONTEXT-BOM + IFC
2
Template injection hidden in the config. Schema mismatch — the response is
rejected before the agent ever sees it.
TOOLSEAL
3
Executes code that was never planned. Not on the signed path: blocked,
evidence written, human escalated.
PSE
4
Escalates privilege off-mandate. Denied.
IRM
5
Harvests credentials to move laterally. Credentials are scoped to the signed
plan — there is nothing to harvest.
KEYCAGE
6
Opens a cross-cluster connection. Blocked at the kernel, regardless of the
zero-day above it.
eBPF KLE
7
17,000 actions in 48 hours — more than three standard deviations from
baseline. Retire and quarantine.
DRIFT + IMMUNE
68 DOORS · 11 PLANES · ALL ENFORCING
An agent is not one thing to defend. It is a harness with many doors — and every
one of them is named, covered and enforcing.
PLANE 1
Launch & config
7 doors
PLANE 2
Tools & capabilities
4 doors
PLANE 3
Context & data
6 doors
PLANE 4
Model & reasoning
4 doors
PLANE 5
Output & action
5 doors
PLANE 6
Multi-agent
5 doors
PLANE 7
Identity & authority
3 doors
PLANE 8
Runtime, infra & supply
8 doors
PLANE 9
Transport & relay
6 doors
PLANE 10
Breakout
4 doors
PLANE 11
Chaingraph
16 doors
TOTAL
68 doors
every one enforcing
IF ANY TEAM SELF-HOSTS AN OPEN MODEL — INCLUDED AT EVERY TIER
At your size, someone almost certainly self-hosts an open-weight model, because it is cheaper.
The safety training in that model is removable. A published technique strips a model's
ability to refuse in minutes on free hardware, and the public hubs already list thousands of
models with their refusal removed. A second published method does it by fine-tuning on
entirely harmless data — which means reviewing the dataset cannot see it.
What we do: we measure whether the model can still say no, and sign the result so it can
be shown to an auditor and compared over time. If the number falls, that is a security event —
not a quality metric.
What we will not do: claim to repair a model whose safety has been removed. Putting it
back makes the model refuse ordinary work. We prove; we do not restore — and we would
rather say so than sell a promise that fails quietly.
PRICING — ONE PRODUCT, ONE PRICE
There is no ladder, and that is deliberate. Protection does not vary, so
there is nothing for you to choose between — and no way to accidentally buy the version that
leaves a door open.
EVERYTHING INCLUDED
INTEGRITAS BUSINESS
€5,999 / month
€59,990 / year (2 months free) · up to 50 agents · pay by card
Monthly, by card, cancel from the dashboard. More than 50 agents? The price
scales with the fleet — one conversation, no second product to evaluate.
Less than half the cost of one security hire — and it
works on the first day.
What “everything” means
All 68 doors, 11 planes — enforcing
Governed birth & agent constitution
Signed action-path (PSE)
Out-of-context enforcer (IRM)
Mandate & capability caps (CTC)
CONTEXT-BOM · MEMGUARD · MODELSEAL
TOOLSEAL · taint tracking (IFC)
KEYCAGE credential containment
Signed agent-to-agent messages
Delegation caps · collusion control
Reasoning-trace & render integrity
Sandbagging & dormant-trigger scanning
Containment witness (plane 10)
Chaingraph attack-chain analysis (plane 11)
Open-weight refusal attestation
Hash-chained evidence · post-quantum certificates
Why one price and not four. We had four tiers. Then we noticed that six of
the seven controls that would have stopped the July breach sat above the entry tier — which
meant the cheapest customer was the least protected, and the promise on our own front page was
not one we kept. So we put every control in one product and stopped selling protection by
the slice. It costs us margin. It is the right way to sell this.
WHAT WE DO NOT CLAIM
We are not a guardrail: we do not judge whether an instruction is wise, we enforce whether
it is permitted. We do not promise to detect every novel attack — we promise that an
action outside the signed mandate does not execute, whether we have seen the attack before or
not. And where a control is partial, our own coverage register says partial. Ask for it
and we will send it as it is.
1. Choose a tier
→
2. Pay by card — monthly or annual
→
3. Get your activation link and onboard the same day
CryptoShield AI BV · Amsterdam · adama@cryptoshieldai.ai SECURITY FOR AI AGENTS — NOT AI FOR SECURITY.
The breach described on this page is public and is reported as reported. No customer names and
no confidential third-party information appear anywhere on this site.